 http://dapmalaysia.org  
  
Forward
 
  
 Feedback
 
http://dapmalaysia.org  
  
Forward
 
  
 Feedback 
  
  
| 
        
        Media Conference Statement by Lim Kit Siang 
        at the DAP Ipoh Timur Election Ops Centre, Ipoh on Wednesday, 5th 
        March 2008 at 2 pm:  
        More seats won by 
        MCA will only result in worsening UMNO political hegemony When MCA should be 
        most influential and powerful after the 1999 general election when 
        Chinese voters saved UMNO and Barisan Nasional to ensure their getting 
        two-thirds parliamentary majority, MCA was weakest in allowing the rise 
        of UMNO political hegemony. New Straits Times 
        has turned into a MCA and Barisan Nasional (BN) propaganda broadsheet 
        today with the front-page headline: “Chinese voters have a simple 
        choice: a bigger say in parliament and government, or a louder voice in 
        parliament without real influence…” Quoting the MCA 
        strategist, Datuk Wong Mook Leong,said “the reality was that whenever 
        the DAP did better than MCA, it was a major setback for the community”. Wong said: “In 
        1986, DAP won 24 seats while MCA got 18. In 1990, DAP continued to lead 
        MCA by two parliamentary seats. “DAP claims that 
        in those two terms, it was a major step for democracy. But the truth is, 
        it was two terms of major setbacks for the Chinese community.” This is a very 
        dishonest distortion of Malaysian political history. Firstly, this 
        analysis flies in the face of the truth that it was after these two 
        major successive wins by the DAP in the 1986 and 1990 general elections 
        that UMNO finally relented and abandoned its three-decade-long 
        nation-building policy of assimilation and finally accepted the DAP 
        contention that for a plural nation like Malaysia, with diverse races, 
        languages, cultures and religions, only a policy of integration can 
        succeed to unite the people and hold the nation together. It was after the 
        DAP’s consecutive electoral gains in 1986 and 1990 general elections 
        that Vision 2020 with its objective of creating a Bangsa Malaysia was 
        proclaimed by the then Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad 
        in February 1991, marking the abandonment of the assimilation policy of 
        “one language, one culture” and acceptance of the integration policy of 
        “many languages and many cultures” in Malaysia. This was 
        subsequently admitted publicly by Mahathir in September 1995, when he 
        said that citizens should be proud of being Malaysians and work together 
        instead of being preoccupied with ethnic origin. He said to realise 
        the goal of Bangsa Malaysia, the people should start accepting each 
        other as they are, regardless of race and religion.  Mahathir said at 
        the time that certain quarters may condemn him for wanting to achieve 
        Bangsa Malaysia and not struggling for the Malay cause as he did during 
        his early years in politics. He said when he 
        was fighting for the Malay cause per se, he was young and his thoughts 
        were that of an inexperienced politician. He stressed that 
        in future; there would be no nation in the world which would have a 
        single ethnic group as its citizen.  
        
        “Zaman berubah. Kalau dahulu tumpuan ialah kita kepada asimilasi. Di 
        mana-mana negara juga tidak ada lagi usaha untuk “asimilasi”, bahkan di 
        Amerika Syarikat mereka sering bercakap berkenaan dengan “roots” 
        asal-usul mereka. Jadi kalau kita sudah terima bahawa itu tidak mungkin, 
        kita perlu cari jalan lain untuk merapatkan perhubungan antara kaum ini. 
        Seperti kata De Bono, Lateral Thinking, kalau kita tidak boleh merentas 
        satu jalan maka kita pergi ke jalan lain untuk sampai ke matlamat yang 
        sama.”  Again in his 
        interview with TIME magazine in December 1996, he said in a Q & A: Mahathir: The idea 
        before was that people should become 100% Malay in order to be 
        Malaysian. We now accept that this is a multi-racial country. We should 
        build bridges instead of trying to remove completely the barriers 
        separating us. We do not intend to convert all the Chinese to Islam, and 
        we tell our people, the Muslims, “you will not try to force people to 
        convert”.  I had at the time 
        commend Mahathir for the evolution of his thinking on nation-building 
        for Malaysia, for this was one of the cornerstones of the DAP political 
        struggle when we were formed in 1966, to establish that Malaysia is a 
        multi-racial, multi-lingual, multi-cultural and multi-religious nation 
        and that the only viable and successful nation-building policy must be 
        one based on integration and not on assimilation.  Many DAP leaders 
        had to pay a heavy price in terms of loss of personal freedoms or being 
        persecuted in courts for courageously defending and upholding the rights 
        of all races, languages, cultures and religions in a multi-racial 
        Malaysia. There is no doubt 
        that if there had been no DAP in the last three decades, the attempt to 
        impose a “One Language, One Culture” Policy in Malaysia would have been 
        taken to extreme lengths with disastrous results both for national unity 
        as well as development.  As a result of 
        this paradigm shift in nation-building caused by the DAP’s consistent 
        political stand, there was what I called “minor liberalization” in 
        government nation-building policies and programmes on language, 
        education and culture, which fell far short of the “full liberalization” 
        that envisaged as the successful path for Malaysian nation-building. In 1995, 1999 and 
        2004, DAP suffered electoral setbacks with the MCA making great 
        electoral gains. The 1999 general 
        election deserves special mention. In 1999 general election, the Anwar 
        Ibrahim “black eye” effect created political ferment among the Malay 
        voters, with the Malays prepared for change, resulting in UMNO suffering 
        its worst electoral defeat in its party history. UMNO and Barisan 
        Nasional would have lost their two-thirds parliamentary majority if the 
        Chinese voters had not come to their rescue, voting to shore up Barisan 
        Nasional’s two-thirds majority. Instead of DAP 
        winning some 30 parliamentary seats, which would have resulted in the BN 
        losing its two-thirds parliamentary majority, and ushering in a new era 
        for democratic change and greater liberalization in economic and 
        nation-building policies, DAP suffered a major setback and won only 10 
        parliamentary seats. MCA won 36 
        parliamentary seats. Did MCA’s huge slate of parliamentary seats and the 
        role of the Malaysian Chinese voters in saving the UMNO and BN from 
        losing its two-third parliamentary majority in the 1999 general election 
        resulted in a more just and equal nation-building policy and greater MCA 
        representation in government, as increase in the number of MCA Cabinet 
        Ministers and their appointment to key Ministries, like Finance and 
        Industry which was previously occupied by MCA Ministers in the early 
        years of Merdeka? None at all. When 
        MCA should be most influential and powerful after the 1999 general 
        election when Chinese voters saved UMNO and Barisan Nasional to ensure 
        their getting two-thirds parliamentary majority, MCA was weakest in 
        allowing the rise of UMNO political hegemony from 1999 – 2008. Examples are 
        galore of the rise of UMNO political hegemony, which marginalizes not 
        only the other BN component parties but all communities, whether Malays, 
        Chinese, Indians, Kadazan-Dusun-Murut and Ibans. There is a long 
        list to illustrate the rise of UMNO political hegemony in the past nine 
        years, but I need only mention the following few: • The “929 
        Declaration Malaysia as an Islamic state on Sept. 29, 2001; • The UMNO Youth 
        threat to burn down the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall over the Suqiu 
        controversy; • The extension of 
        the New Economic Policy from a 20-year span to 50 years and beyond; • UMNO Youth 
        Hishammuddin Hussein’s wielding of the Malay keris at the UMNO Youth 
        assembly; • The rejection of 
        the Bangsa Malaysia objective of Vision 2020 by powerful circles and 
        forces in UMNO; • The humiliation 
        suffered by non-UMNO Ministers who had submitted a memorandum to the 
        Prime Minister in 2006 about freedom of religion over the Moorthy 
        snatch-body case, coupled with rapid increases of religious polarization 
        over body-snatching, banning of Christian Bibles in Bahasa Malaysia 
        using “Allah”, restriction of freedom of religion of non-Muslim 
        communities like the Kudat Mazu controversy; • Blatant abuse of 
        NEP to spawn even worse corruption, cronyism and nepotism (CCN) in the 
        Abdullah administration as compared to the Mahathir premiership, with 
        the bumiputras being used to serve the interests of Umnoputras; and • The Hindraf 
        phenomenon of nation-wide Indian protest at their long-standing 
        marginalization. Wong Mook Leong is 
        wrong. The more seats the MCA wins, the greater the trend towards Umno 
        political hegemony. This is why in the 12th general election, a vote for 
        the BN is a vote for UMNO political hegemony, and why all Malaysians 
        regardless of race or religion should unite to smash UMNO political 
        hegemony, which is completely different from UMNO dominance in BN and 
        can be a Frankestein in the Malaysian political landscape. *
    
      Lim 
    Kit Siang, DAP Parliamentary 
        Candidate & DAP Central Policy and Strategic Planning Commission 
        Chairman | ||
|  |