| Support for Najib’s proposal 
    for an amicable settlement of the proposal to build the world’s tallest Mazu 
    statue in Kudat and call for a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the 
    mishandling and lack of good governance in all three tiers of local, state 
    and federal government resulting in the Kudat Mazu statue controversy 
    undermining nation-building, inter-religious understanding and turning 
    Malaysia an international laughing-stock ______________Media Statement
 by  Lim Kit Siang
 _________________
 
      (Parliament, 
      Monday):  
      I welcome the statement by the 
      Deputy Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak yesterday expressing the 
      government’s hope that former Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri Chong Kah Kiat 
      will settle the Mazu status issue amicably without going to court.
 He said the government is hoping to bring the Mazu statue issue back to 
      the negotiation table instead of going through the court.
 
 I support Najib’s proposal for an amicable settlement of the proposal to 
      build the world’s tallest Mazu statue in Kudat.
 
 It is important however for Najib to understand that the principles and 
      issues involved in the Mazu statue controversy do not just concern Chong 
      as one person, but have become a major public issue of national and even 
      international importance involving not just three million Sabahans but 
      also 26 million Malaysians.
 
 I am glad that immediately after my visit to Kudat to visit the site of 
      the Mazu statue, there is now the possibility of a new development.
 
 The Mazu statue controversy should not only be resolved at the negotiation 
      table, I will go even one step further and call for a Royal Commission of 
      Inquiry into the mishandling and lack of good governance in all three 
      tiers of local, state and federal government resulting in the Kudat Mazu 
      statue controversy undermining nation-building and inter-religious 
      understanding as well as turning Malaysia into an international 
      laughing-stock.
 
 I have just returned from a three-day visit to Kota Kinabalu, Kudat and 
      Sandakan including a 500-km land journey from Kota Kinabalu through Kota 
      Belud to Kudat and onwards to Sandakan through Marudu, with the 
      Kudat-Sandakan journey taking eight hours through some very treacherous 
      stretches (with 25 km of unsealed portion of the Paitan highway after the 
      Nango junction).
 
 Yesterday morning, together with DAP National Publicity Secretary and MP 
      for Seputeh Teresa Kok, Kota Kinabalu DAP Branch Chairman Hiew King Cheu 
      and Karambunai DAP Branch Chairman Pastor Jeffrey Kumin I visited the site 
      of the Mazu statute (where over a million ringgit had been spent to 
      complete the statue platform) for a first-hand understanding of the 
      controversy over the proposal to build the world’s tallest Mazu (Goddess 
      of the Sea) in Kudat to enhance the international tourism competitiveness 
      of Kudat, Sabah and Malaysia.
 
 A lot of things happened in the two years between 12th December 2005 when 
      a ground-breaking ceremony for the project for the world’s tallest Mazu 
      statue was held and 12th December 2007 when Chong instituted legal 
      proceedings against the Kudat Town Board (KTB) and the Sabah state 
      government for stopping the project, as evident from the following 
      chronology of events:
 
    
    
      • 12th December 2005 – 
      ground-breaking ceremony for the world’s tallest Mazu statue after 
      approval of site layout and building plans for the project.
 • 8th February 2006 - the Kudat Town Board (KTB) issued a letter of 
      approval valid for two years for the construction of the Mazu statue.
 
        
      Works on the project commenced, 
      including piling and construction of a 20 feet platform which was 
      completed five months later at a cost of RM1 million. 
 Orders were placed for granite carvings of the statue by craftsmen from 
      China and the granite carvings had been shipped from China and are now 
      stored in a containers in Kota Kinabalu.
 
 The Immigration Department had also given approval for visas to be issued 
      to 11 craftsmen from China to assemble the granite carvings of the statue.
 
 • May 25, 2006, KTB, acting on the directive of the Sabah Local 
      Government and Housing Minister, ordered the temporary suspension of the 
      work project pending further directive from the Chief Minister.
 
 • June 6, 2006, the Sabah Local Government and Housing Ministry 
      issued a written directive to KTB to order suspension of works on the 
      project pending approval from the Chief Minister.
 
 • June 23, 2006, the State Secretary issued a letter to the KTB 
      stating that the government had, after considering all the circumstances, 
      decided that works on the project should stop immediately.
 
 • July 7, 2006, the Mufti of Sabah issued a Fatwa (religious 
      decree) advising that the construction of the statue would offend Islam 
      and ordered that the construction be stopped in order to protect the 
      sensitivities of Muslims.
 
 • Nov. 15, 2007, KTB withdrew the approval granted by their letter 
      of Feb. 8, 2006, giving reason that the site layout plan and building 
      plans had not been approved by the second respondent by reason of 
      non-compliance with Section 15 of the Town and Country Planning Ordinance.
 
 • December 12, 2007 – Chong Kah Keat institutes legal proceedings 
      against KTB and Sabah State Government for stopping the work project, 
      seeking declarations from the Kota Kinabalu High Court, inter alias,
 
      1. that the letter of withdrawal of approval dated Nov. 15, 2007 by KTB be 
      revoked, set aside and declared null and void;
 2. that the letter of approval dated Feb. 8, 2006 be confirmed as valid 
      and binding on all parties concerned;
 3. compensation for loss suffered by project proponents.
 
      The reasons which had been 
      given so far do not stand up to any scrutiny. For instance, the argument 
      that the Mazu statue is close to the Asy-Syarikin Mosque in Kudat 
      collapses on close examination.
 This is because the statue would be about 2,400 ft from the mosque, 
      whereas there is another temple, the Fu Tik Temple which is just opposite 
      the mosque across the road in the town centre or about 100 ft away.
 
 The Fu Tik Temple was built as far back as 1941 or some 66 years ago and 
      was there when the Asy-Syarikin Mosque was built in the 80s. If the 
      Asy-Syarikin Mosque had no objection to being so close to the Fu Tik 
      Temple, the oldest temple of the Hokkien community in Kudat, and build it 
      in the 80s about 100 ft away, why should there be any objection to the 
      building of the Mazu statue which is about 2,400 ft away?
 
 There are many places of worship of different faiths in the country which 
      are next to one another and even share the use of common passages or 
      spaces, for instance a temple and a mosque in Kuching which one above 
      another while in Miri there is a church and a mosque next to each other 
      sharing the use of common passageways.
 
 In ancient times in the Middle East, Muslims, Christians and followers of 
      other faiths share the same premises for their religious worship. Why are 
      we not learning the best cultural, religious and civilisation practices in 
      the history of mankind but want to blaze out a new path of extremism and 
      intolerance in mutli-religious Malaysia which is also against the 
      constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion?
 
 I understand that the Muslims in Kudat do not have any objection to the 
      building of the world’s tallest Muza statue as they know its great tourism 
      potential in kick-starting the economy in Kudat, which is the poorest in 
      Sabah and therefore in Malaysia.
 
 The insensitive controversy objecting to the building of the Mazu statue 
      is created by a small group of Muslims outside Kudat with ulterior 
      personal and political objectives, which set a dangerous precedent in 
      undermining inter-religious understanding, goodwill and co-existence not 
      only in Sabah state but in Malaysia as well.
 
 The other objection that the construction of any statue or replica of a 
      living thing, either human or animistic, is haram and should not be 
      allowed – which is the fatwa of the Mufti Sabah – is even more subversive 
      of the multi-religious foundation of Malaysia. Imagine the horrendous 
      consequences if such a fatwa is accepted in Malaysia and implemented 
      throughout the country?
 
 The protracted controversy of the Kudat Mazu statue for the past 18 
      months, resulting in the highly-principled protest resignation of Chong 
      Kah Kiat as Sabah Deputy Chief Minister is a reflection of mishandling, 
      total insensitivity and lack of good governance in all three tiers of 
      local, state and federal government resulting in the Kudat Mazu statue 
      controversy undermining nation-building, inter-religious understanding and 
      turning Malaysia an international laughing-stock.
 
 There are two things which Najib should do immediately:
 
    
    
      • Firstly, remove all the 
      man-made and politically-motivated obstacles to the construction of the 
      world’s tallest Mazu statue in Kudat; and 
      • Secondly, get the Federal Cabinet to set up a Royal Commission of 
      Inquiry into the mishandling, insensitivity and lack of good governance in 
      all three tiers of governance, local, state and federal government, 
      resulting in the protracted and divisive Mazu statue controversy so that 
      Malaysia could be spared in future of such misgovernance which could only 
      undermine nation-building, inter-religious understanding and make Malaysia 
      into an international laughing-stock.
 
      (31/12/2007)   
    * Lim 
    Kit Siang,
  Parliamentary 
    Opposition Leader, MP for Ipoh Timur & DAP Central Policy and Strategic 
    Planning Commission Chairman |