| Tsu Koon – what a weak and 
    panicky start as Gerakan’s No. 1 in immediately buckling under pressure by 
    UMNO Youth leader to take disciplinary action against Paranjothy who dared 
    to speak publicly what others only muttered privately 
    ________________Media Conference (2)
 by  Lim Kit Siang
 ___________________
 
      (Ipoh,
      Monday):  
      What a weak and panicky start 
      for Tan Sri Dr. Koh Tsu Koon as Gerakan’s No. 1 – immediately buckling 
      under pressure by UMNO Youth leader, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein to 
      take disciplinary action against the Gerakan Youth vice chief S. 
      Paranjothy who dared to speak publicly what others only muttered 
      privately? – that the 30,000 Indians who took part in the Hindraf 
      demonstration in Kuala Lumpur on November 25 did so to express their 
      frustration and anger because the community had been “marginalized, 
      oppressed and ignored”. 
      Paranjothy had also blamed, and rightly, UMNO leaders, particularly the 
      UMNO Youth Leader Hishammuddin and Deputy UMNO Youth Leader Khairy 
      Jamaluddin for racial posturing and inciting racial sentiments among 
      Malays to gain political mileage – citing as examples the keris-wielding 
      episodes against the former and the public castigation of the Indian news 
      vendors by the latter when the UMNO presidential address of Prime Minister 
      and UMNO President, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was not carried in 
      the press the next day as UMNO General Assembly fell on Deepavali, with 
      the next day an annual press holiday.
 
      There can be no doubt that if a private vote had been taken among the 
      Gerakan leaders, in fact, even MCA and MIC leaders, all would have agreed 
      with the sentiments expressed by Paranjothy!
 
      Hishammuddin had immediately issued an ultimatum to Tsu Koon with the 
      threat of severance of ties with Gerakan not only by UMNO Youth but also 
      by Barisan Nasional unless Tsu Koon could give a satisfactory response and 
      explanation.
 
      What was Tsu Koon reaction? Although he protested that “it is not right” 
      for Hishammuddin to issue the threat and ultimatum of severance of all 
      relationships with Gerakan, Tsu Koon clearly panicked, which was why he 
      complied instantly by referring Paranjothy to the Disciplinary Committee 
      and even anticipated the disciplinary process by saying that the Gerakan 
      Youth vice chief would be suspended or expelled! Nanyang Siang Pau’s 
      headline today is “Gerakan to sack Paranjothy”!
 
      Is Barisan Nasional a coalition of equals of 14 political parties?
 
 Could the Youth leader of Gerakan, MCA, MIC, PPP or any other component 
      party issue a threat or ultimatum to the UMNO President, Datuk Seri 
      Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in the manner Hishammuddin had done to Tsu Koon?
 
 Isn’t this itself a breach of Barisan Nasional discipline and what is Tsu 
      Koon doing about it – just swallow it and pretend it has not happened?
 
 Or does George Orwell’s Animal Farm dictum, that “All animals are equal, 
      but some animals are more equal than others” reign supreme in Barisan 
      Nasional?
 
 Is this why even Khairy as deputy Umno Youth leader could publicly insult 
      and humiliate Tsu Koon as Penang Chief Minister and Gerakan No. 2 last 
      year accusing the Gerakan Penang State Government of “marginalizing” the 
      Malays in Penang, and “facing the same fate of being marginalised as the 
      Malays in Singapore”?
 
      Did the Gerakan leadership issue an ultimatum demanding a satisfactory 
      explanation from the top UMNO leadership over Khairy’s breach of Barisan 
      Nasional discipline with the threat of severance of ties between Gerakan 
      and UMNO?
 
 If Khairy was not guilty of any breach of Barisan Nasional discipline in 
      his open criticism of Tsu Koon, why should Paranjothy’s open criticism of 
      Hishammuddin and Khairy be such gross breach of discipline that Tsu Koon 
      is talking publicly about expulsion? Isn’t this just kowtowing to UMNO 
      Youth?
 
 When the five Hindraf leaders, P. Uthayakumar, V. Ganabathirau, M. 
      Manoharan, R. Kenghadharan and T. Vasanthakumar were detained under the 
      Internal Security Act on 13th December 2007, Tsu Koon provided instant 
      support on the same day declaring that the Prime Minister-cum-Internal 
      Security Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, must have compelling 
      reasons to invoke the draconian Internal Security Act (ISA).
 
 Tsu Koon and the Gerakan leadership also fully supported the infamous 
      Operation Lalang mass arrests under the ISA and the series of assaults on 
      the independence and integrity of the judiciary by the executive in the 
      past 19 years, starting with the 1988 “mother” of judicial crisis with the 
      arbitrary sacking of Tun Salleh Abas as Lord President and Datuk George 
      Seah and the late Tan Sri Wan Suleiman Pawanteh as Supreme Court judges.
 
 What has happened to Gerakan’s claim as the “conscience” of Barisan 
      Nasional?
 
 
      (24/12/2007)   
    * Lim 
    Kit Siang,
  Parliamentary 
    Opposition Leader, MP for Ipoh Timur & DAP Central Policy and Strategic 
    Planning Commission Chairman |